General News

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Says He Is Positive “Hacked” Email Not From A Russian source.

By  | 

In response to the assertion, from Democrats and the Drive By Media, that the Russian government had inserted itself and influenced the American presidential election, Fox News’ Sean Hannity sat down with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to discuss the matter in an exclusive interview.

During the election season, Hillary Clinton’s campaign was embarrassed, on multiple occasions, when private emails from the campaign’s chairman were made public, exposing corruption and the media’s collusion with Democrats to secure the White House for Hillary.

The claim is that, although the information dumps were published by Wikileaks, it was the Russian government that “hacked” the DNC and Podesta’s emails to begin with.

The conclusion is that Vladimir Putin, or someone withing the Russian government, wanted to either put Trump into the White House, or to flex their muscles to show that they could affect an American election.

Lame duck president Barack Obama went so far as to issue sanctions on the Russian government for the cyber-hacking and the exposing of sensitive Democratic Party information.

The irony here is that when Russia supposedly breached national security, Obama demanded sanctions be placed to punish the country.

When Hillary Clinton was proven to have endangered national security with her unsecured, private email server, Obama endorsed her to be the next president of the United States.

Russia has denied the allegations that the Obama administration and Democratic Party operatives have laid against them, and, probably more importantly, so has Julian Assange.

The Wikileaks founder has repeatedly claimed that the information was not obtained through the Russian government, and has even denied that there was any “hacking” involved.

During his nearly hour long sit-down with Sean Hannity, Assange said that the information came from a source other than the Russian government.

He noted that during all of the press conferences with the Obama administration, and from all of the reports about Russian hacking released from the lame duck administration, there was never any mention of Wikileaks.

Even so, Assange questioned what it would mean if the Obama administration’s narrative was to be believed, and just for the sake of argument, we were to entertain the notion that it was Russia that obtained the DNC and Podesta emails.

“What are they saying? That the problem here is Wikileaks published true information, that the American people read.

That information was the words of Hillary Clinton, her campaign manager John Podesta, and other people within her campaign.

The American people read that information, true information, and said, ‘We don’t like these people.'” 



Hannity asked Assange, directly, whether or not Wikileaks received any of the Democratic emails from from the Russian government or an operative of the Russian government.

“We can say, and we have said, repeatedly, over the last two months, that our source is not the Russian government, and it is not the state party.”

Hannity then asked the next logical question, which is whether or not Barack Obama was lying as he was going in front of the cameras and saying that it was the Russian government that influenced the election.

“Well if you look at what he’s saying, he’s acting like a lawyer. He doesn’t say that Wikileaks obtained information from Russia, worked with Russia… 

…And you will also notice, from statements that I have read, that he doesn’t say that Russia was trying to influence the election for Donald Trump. Obama doesn’t say that. So you have to be very careful about the lawyerly language that is being used to try and conflate things together. “

The interview continues, and is absolutely fascinating. You can watch it below.

The question that remains, is who do you believe? Without Barack Obama or anyone within his administration publicly releasing the information that supposedly proves that Russia hacked the Democratic Party’s email accounts, and fed that information to Wikileaks, it becomes a matter of Obama’s word versus Assange’s.

Whether you like Wikileaks or not, the organization has a history of being 100% factually honest about what they release.

On the other hand, Barack Obama has lied so many times that a person can simply lose count.

If you like your health care and doctor, you can keep them…

I first heard about it on the news, the same as you…

That $400 million to Iran was simply the repayment of a 30 year debt that we decided to pay in cash, on an unmarked cargo plane, and in the dead of night…

Who do you trust more, Julian Asssange or Barack Obama?



Source: Yahoo! News

Report Complaints We welcome complaints about errors that warrant correction (inaccurate information, grammatical errors, etc). To report a problem click on the blue “Report Content” button below. If that doesn’t work you can also use our Contact Form.

For opinion articles, information and opinions put forth by contributors are exclusive to them and do not represent the views of US Chronicle.

  • You must be logged in to post a comment Login

    Spelling error report

    The following text will be sent to our editors: